Could late-latent syphilis be treated with a single subcutaneous infusion of long-acting penicillin?

Syphilis is an important global health threat and little has changed in its treatment since the mid-20th century. For late-latent or syphilis infection of unknown duration, the standard treatment of multiple intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) are associated with significant pain and distress to clients and caregivers, negatively impacting on treatment completion. Based on pharmacokinetic modelling from a Phase I study of subcutaneous infusion of high dose BPG (SCIP), we present its feasibility, safety and tolerability for treatment of syphilis in a single infusion. SCIP leads to more sustained penicillin concentrations above the desired target with less reported pain and reduced clinic visits.

Safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous levodopa-carbidopa infusion (ND0612) for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations (BouNDless): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional oral levodopa therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease can be associated with variations in plasma concentrations. Levodopa infusion strategies might provide more consistent drug delivery and fewer motor fluctuations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 (a levodopa-carbidopa solution) compared with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicentre trial at 117 academic and community neurology sites in 16 countries, including in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Eligible participants were men and women aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 in the on state) who experienced at least 2·5 h/day of off time. Participants underwent an open-label run-in phase (<12 weeks), during which time optimal regimens were established for both oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa and for 24 h/day subcutaneous ND0612 infusion (levodopa-carbidopa 60·0/7·5 mg/mL), with supplemental oral levodopa-carbidopa if needed. Participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with their optimised regimen of either subcutaneous ND0612 or oral levodopa-carbidopa, with matching oral or subcutaneous placebo given as required to maintain blinding. Randomisation was done via an interactive web response system, stratified by region, using a permuted block schedule. Participants, study partners, treating investigators, study site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (ie, time of randomisation, when all patients were receiving an optimised open-label ND0612 regimen) to end of the double-blind phase in total daily on time without troublesome dyskinesia, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006210, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2019, and April 8, 2022, 381 participants were enrolled, of whom 259 (68%) were randomly assigned, 128 (49%) to subcutaneous ND0612 and 131 (51%) to oral levodopa-carbidopa. 243 (94%) participants completed the study. Treatment with subcutaneous ND0612 provided an additional 1·72 h (95% CI 1·08 to 2·36) of on time without troublesome dyskinesia compared with oral levodopa-carbidopa (change from baseline of -0·48 h [-0·94 to -0·02] with subcutaneous ND0612 vs -2·20 h [-2·65 to -1·74] with oral levodopa-carbidopa; p<0·0001). Significant treatment differences favouring subcutaneous ND0612 were also found in the first four of nine prespecified hierarchical outcomes of daily off time (-1·40 h [95% CI -1·99 to -0·80]), Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II scores (-3·05 [-4·28 to -1·81]), Patients Global Impression of Change (odds ratio [OR] 5·31 [2·67 to 10·58]), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (OR 7·23 [3·57 to 14·64]). Hierarchical testing ended after the fourth secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported by 287 (89%) of 322 participants during open-label ND0612 optimisation, and by 103 (80%) of 128 in the ND0612 group and 97 (74%) of 131 in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase. The most common adverse events were infusion-site reactions (266 [83%] participants during open-label ND0612, and 73 [57%] in the ND0612 group vs 56 [43%] in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase), most of which were mild. Serious adverse events in four participants in the ND0612 group were related to study treatment (infusion-site cellulitis [n=2], infusion-site abscess and infusion-site ulcer [n=1]; and paraesthesia and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy [n=1]). One participant in the ND0612 group died during the double-blind phase, but the death was not related to study treatment (fall leading to traumatic brain injury). INTERPRETATION: Results of this phase 3 study showed that subcutaneous ND0612 used in combination with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa increased on time without troublesome dyskinesia and reduced off time, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. ND0612 might offer a safe and efficacious subcutaneous levodopa infusion approach to managing motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. The ongoing open-label extension phase will provide further information on the long-term efficacy and safety of treatment. FUNDING: NeuroDerm.

Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment patterns in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases.

Aim: This retrospective study investigated real-world hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) treatment patterns in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) in Poland. Methods: Clinical and demographic information, fSCIG treatment parameters and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records of 28 participants (aged ≤18 years) with PIDs who received fSCIG. Results: 18 participants (64.3%) started fSCIG with a ramp-up (median duration: 35.5 days). 27 patients (96.4%) were administered fSCIG every 4 weeks and one patient every 3 weeks. 25 patients (89.3%) used one infusion site. No serious bacterial infections occurred. Conclusion: Data support the feasibility of administering fSCIG to children and adolescents with PIDs every 3-4 weeks using a single infusion site and indicate flexibility in modifying fSCIG infusion parameters. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04636502 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins, are proteins that are made by the immune system to help fight infections. In primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs), part of the immune system may be missing or not working properly. This study looked at the use of an antibody treatment called hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (or fSCIG) in Polish children aged 18 years or younger with PIDs. Information on patients, their disease, how fSCIG was being used and how patients responded to treatment was taken from medical records. Out of 28 patients, 18/28 (64.3%) had their fSCIG dose slowly increased, which took an average of 35.5 days. Overall, 27/28 patients were treated with fSCIG every 4 weeks (96.4%), and 25/28 patients used one place to inject fSCIG (89.3%). No serious infections caused by bacteria happened during the study. The study results suggest that children with PIDs could be treated every 3 to 4 weeks with fSCIG, and that flexibility in how fSCIG is injected may offer options suited to individual patients.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy in patients with immunodeficiencies - impact of drug packaging and administration method on patient reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Here, the perspective of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiency receiving subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) via introductory smaller size pre-filled syringes (PFS) or vials were compared. METHODS: An online survey was conducted in Canada by the Association des Patients Immunodéficients du Québec (APIQ) (10/2020-03/2021). Survey questions included: reasons for choosing SCIg packaging and administration methods, training experiences, infusion characteristics, and switching methods. The survey captured structured patient-reported outcomes: treatment satisfaction and its sub-domains, symptom state, general health perception, and physical and mental function. Respondents using PFS were compared with vial users, overall and stratified by their administration method (pump or manual push). RESULTS: Of the 132 total respondents, 66 respondents used vials, with 38 using a pump and 28 using manual push. PFS (5 and 10 mL sizes) were being used by 120 respondents, with 38 using a pump and 82 using manual push. PFS users were associated with a 17% lower median (interquartile range) SCIg dose (10 [8, 12] vs. 12 [9, 16] g/week, respectively), a significantly shorter infusion preparation time (15 [10, 20] vs. 15 [10, 30] mins, respectively), and a trend for shorter length of infusion (60 [35, 90] vs. 70 [48, 90] mins, respectively) compared with those on vials. Patient-reported treatment satisfaction scores were overall similar between vial and PFS users (including on the domains of effectiveness and convenience), except for a higher score for vials over PFS on the domain of global satisfaction (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prescribing that reflects a recognition of less wastage, PFS users were associated with a significantly lower SCIg dose compared with vial users. PFS users were also associated with shorter pre-infusion times, reflecting simpler administration mechanics compared with vial users. Higher global satisfaction with treatment among vial users compared with PFS users was consistent with users being limited to smaller PFS size options in Canada during the study period. Patient experience on PFS is expected to improve with the introduction of larger PFS sizes. Overall, treatment satisfaction for SCIg remains consistently high with the introduction of PFS packaging compared with vials.

Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Treatment Increases the Quality of Life and Decreases the Number of Infections and Hospitalizations in Children with Primary Immunodeficiencies.

INTRODUCTION: Immunoglobulin replacement therapy is an effective lifelong treatment modality used in patients with primary immunodeficiency to prevent and/or reduce the incidence of serious infections. Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) was developed to combine the advantages of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) and is the latest method of immunoglobulin G (IgG) administration. In this study, switching to fSCIG administration in primary immunodeficiency patients receiving regular IVIG or SCIG therapy was evaluated, and serum IgG trough levels, frequency of infections, frequency and duration of hospitalizations, duration of absence from school/work, and quality of life were determined. METHODS: In this study, fifteen patients with primary immunodeficiency who were previously receiving IVIG or SCIG treatment, followed by fSCIG, were evaluated retrospectively. Age, diagnosis, current complications, mean IgG value, frequency of infection, frequency of hospitalization, and duration of absenteeism from school and work were recorded during and before fSCIG treatment. At the beginning of fSCIG treatment, at 6th and 12th months, "The Quality of Life Scale" was also evaluated in patients and parents. RESULTS: The most common indications for initiation of fSCIG treatment were the difficulty of access to the hospital and the long transfusion periods. No systemic adverse reactions were reported except for redness, swelling, and mild pain on the injection site. The median IgG values for the last 1 year were 529.6 mg/dL for IVIG (n = 9), 876.2 mg/dL for SCIG (n = 6) and 856.7 mg/dL for fSCIG (n = 15, all patients) treatment. The frequency of infections and the number of hospitalizations decreased significantly in the fSCIG group compared to both previous treatment modalities. There was a significant increase in the quality of life score of the patients and their families when compared with previous treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: fSCIG is an effective treatment method and is well tolerated in patients with immunodeficiency. It provides stable immunoglobulin levels and excellent protection against infections and offers the patients the possibility of home-based therapy.

Population pharmacokinetics of immunoglobulin G after intravenous, subcutaneous, or hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous administration in immunoglobulin-naive patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy is the standard of care for patients with primary immunodeficiencies with antibody deficiencies. Intravenous (IVIG), subcutaneous (SCIG), and hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) therapies differ in their pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, administration routes, and dosing regimens. Information on use of subcutaneous therapy in IgG treatment-naive patients is limited. This study used population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-based simulations to characterize IgG PKs in IgG-naive patients with varying disease severity across several IVIG, SCIG, and fSCIG dosing regimens. An integrated popPK model, developed and validated using data from eight clinical trials, was utilized to simulate scenarios that varied by therapy, loading regimen, maintenance dose (equivalent to 400, 600, or 800 mg/kg every 4 weeks [Q4W]), and baseline endogenous total IgG concentration (1.5 or 4.0 g/L). Simulations were performed for age groups of 2-<6, 6-<12, 12-<18, and ≥18 years. Steady-state serum trough IgG concentrations (Cmin,ss), proportion of patients achieving Cmin,ss ≥ 7 g/L, and days taken to reach this threshold were summarized. SCIG provided greater mean Cmin,ss values than IVIG and fSCIG for any scenario. Across all therapies, Cmin,ss tended to increase with age, dose, and endogenous concentration. Although the findings are model-based and not a summarization of real-world observations, doses ≥ 800 mg/kg Q4W with corresponding loading regimens are likely to be clinically appropriate for achieving target IgG concentrations in treatment-naive patients in a timely manner, especially at low endogenous starting concentrations. Therapy-specific dose adjustment based on baseline endogenous IgG concentration, clinical status, and patient characteristics may be warranted.

A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Assess the Tolerability, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 20% in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 20% will allow reduced infusion volumes and frequency versus existing subcutaneous therapies such as fSCIG 10% and conventional subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20%, respectively. We assessed the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of warmed and unwarmed fSCIG 20%. METHODS: This phase 1, single-dose, open-label, three-arm study enrolled healthy adults aged 19-50 years (inclusive) at a single US center (NCT05059977). Post-screening, participants received a single fSCIG 20% dose comprising recombinant human hyaluronidase and varying doses of in-line warmed or unwarmed immunoglobulin G (IgG) during a 4-day treatment period in a sentinel and sequential dosing design (treatment arm 1, warmed IgG 20% 0.4 g/kg; treatment arm 2, warmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg; treatment arm 3, unwarmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg). Participants were followed for 12 (± 1) weeks post-infusion. The primary endpoint was tolerability ("tolerable" infusions were not interrupted, stopped, or reduced in rate owing to fSCIG 20%-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)). Secondary endpoints included occurrence of TEAEs. RESULTS: Overall, 24 participants were included, 8 per treatment arm (mean age 39.0 years, 54.2% men). All participants tolerated the infusions. All TEAEs were mild (107 events, in all participants), and all participants experienced fSCIG 20%-related (105 events) and local (102 events) TEAEs. Infusion site erythema and infusion site swelling were most frequently reported. No serious TEAEs occurred, and no participants discontinued the study owing to TEAEs. CONCLUSION: fSCIG 20% was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile in healthy adults. Future studies will evaluate fSCIG 20% in primary immunodeficiency diseases. Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT05059977 (registered 28 September 2021).

Nationwide Retrospective Analysis of Combinations of Advanced Therapies in Patients With Parkinson Disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Advanced therapies (ATs; deep brain stimulation [DBS] or pump therapies: continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion [CSAI], levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel [LCIG]) are used in later stages of Parkinson disease (PD). However, decreasing efficacy over time and/or side effects may require an AT change or combination in individual patients. Current knowledge about changing or combining ATs is limited to mostly retrospective and small-scale studies. The nationwide case collection Combinations of Advanced Therapies in PD assessed simultaneous or sequential AT combinations in Germany since 2005 to analyze their clinical outcome, their side effects, and the reasons for AT modifications. METHODS: Data were acquired retrospectively by modular questionnaires in 22 PD centers throughout Germany based on clinical records and comprised general information about the centers/patients, clinical (Mini-Mental Status Test/Montréal Cognitive Assessment, Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS], side effects, reasons for AT modification), and therapeutical (ATs with specifications, oral medication) data. Data assessment started with initiation of the second AT. RESULTS: A total of 148 AT modifications in 116 patients were associated with significantly improved objective (median decrease of MDS-UPDRS Part III 4.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV 6.0 points [p < 0.001], of MDS-UPDRS Part IV-off-time item 1.0 points [p < 0.001]) and subjective clinical outcome and decreasing side effect rates. Main reasons for an AT modification were insufficient symptom control and side effects of the previous therapy. Subgroup analyses suggest addition of DBS in AT patients with leading dyskinesia, addition of LCIG for leading other cardinal motor symptoms, and addition of LCIG or CSAI for dominant off-time. The most long-lasting therapy-until requiring a modification-was DBS. DISCUSSION: Changing or combining ATs may be beneficial when 1 AT is insufficient in efficacy or side effects. The outcome of an AT combination is comparable with the clinical benefit by introducing the first AT. The added AT should be chosen dependent on dominant clinical symptoms and adverse effects. Furthermore, prospective trials are needed to confirm the results of this exploratory case collection. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that, in patients with PD, changing or combining ATs is associated with an improvement in the MDS-UPDRS or subjective symptom reporting.

Subcutaneous infusion of high-dose benzathine penicillin G is safe, tolerable, and suitable for less-frequent dosing for rheumatic heart disease secondary prophylaxis: a phase 1 open-label population pharmacokinetic study.

Since 1955, the recommended strategy for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) secondary prophylaxis has been benzathine penicillin G [BPG; 1.2 MU (900 mg)] injections administered intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Due to dosing frequency, pain, and programmatic challenges, adherence is suboptimal. It has previously been demonstrated that BPG delivered subcutaneously at a standard dose is safe and tolerable and has favorable pharmacokinetics, setting the scene for improved regimens with less frequent administration. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous infusions of high-dose BPG were assessed in 24 healthy adult volunteers assigned to receive either 3.6, 7.2, or 10.8 MU (three, six, and nine times the standard dose, respectively) as a single subcutaneous infusion. The delivery of the BPG to the subcutaneous tissue was confirmed with ultrasonography. Safety assessments, pain scores, and penicillin concentrations were measured for 16 weeks post-dose. Subcutaneous infusion of penicillin (SCIP) was generally well tolerated with all participants experiencing transient, mild infusion-site reactions. Prolonged elevated penicillin concentrations were described using a combined zero-order (44 days) and first-order (t1/2 = 12 days) absorption pharmacokinetic model. In simulations, time above the conventionally accepted target concentration of 20 ng/mL (0.02 µg/mL) was 57 days for 10.8 MU delivered by subcutaneous infusion every 13 weeks compared with 9 days of every 4-weekly dosing interval for the standard 1.2 MU intramuscular dose (i.e., 63% and 32% of the dosing interval, respectively). High-dose SCIP (BPG) is safe, has acceptable tolerability, and may be suitable for up to 3 monthly dosing intervals for secondary prophylaxis of RHD.

Subcutaneous ketamine infusion in palliative patients for major depressive disorder (SKIPMDD)-Phase II single-arm open-label feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine at subanaesthetic dosages (≤0.5mg/kg) exhibits rapid onset (over hours to days) antidepressant effects against major depressive disorder in people who are otherwise well. However, its safety, tolerability and efficacy are not known for major depressive disorder in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, safety, tolerability, acceptability and any antidepressant signal/activity to justify and inform a fully powered study of subcutaneous ketamine infusions for major depressive disorder in the palliative setting. METHODS: This was a single arm, open-label, phase II feasibility study (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Number-ACTRN12618001586202). We recruited adults (≥ 18-years-old) with advanced life-limiting illnesses referred to four palliative care services in Sydney, Australia, diagnosed with major depressive disorder from any care setting. Participants received weekly subcutaneous ketamine infusion (0.1-0.4mg/kg) over two hours using individual dose-titration design. Outcomes assessed were feasibility, safety, tolerability and antidepressant activity. RESULTS: Out of ninety-nine referrals, ten participants received ketamine and were analysed for responses. Accrual rate was 0.54 participants/month across sites with 50% of treated participants achieving ≥ 50% reduction in baseline Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, meeting feasibility criteria set a priori. There were no clinically relevant harms encountered. CONCLUSIONS: A future definitive trial exploring the effectiveness of subcutaneous infusion of ketamine for major depressive disorder in the palliative care setting may be feasible by addressing identified study barriers. Individual dose-titration of subcutaneous ketamine infusions over two hours from 0.1mg/kg can be well-tolerated and appears to produce transient antidepressant signals over hours to days.

Inibidor da C1 esterase derivado de plasma via subcutânea para profilaxia de crises de angioedema hereditário / Plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor subcutaneously for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema crises

INTRODUÇÃO: O angioedema hereditário (AEH) é uma imunodeficiência primária do sistema complemento, e foi classificado como um erro inato da imunidade em decorrência da deficiência de inibidor de C1 esterase, proteína que controla as vias de ativação do complemento. Trata-se de doença com herança autossômica dominante, heterogeneidade de lócus e expressividade variável. A classificação mais atualizada do AEH agrupa os pacientes naqueles com deficiência do inibidor da C1- esterase (C1-INH), codificado pelo gene SERPING1 e naqueles C1-INH normal (anteriormente denominado de tipo III). O diagnóstico é realizado através do exame clínico (anamnese, exame físico e quadro clínico) e laboratorial (dosagem de C4 e de C1-INH), além de teste genético (presença de mutação patogênica em SERPING1) para confirmação. Embora AEH não tenha cura, há tratamento para a profilaxia e controle das crises. Atualmente, para o tratamento de profilaxia, o Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas (PCDT) do angioedema associado a deficiência de C1 esterase (C1-INH) do Ministério da Saúde, recomenda o uso de andrógenos atenuados, sendo o mais utilizado o danazol, e plasma fresco congelado para o tratamento de crises. PERGUNTA 1: O inibidor de C1 esterase via subcutânea é uma alternativa na

Home initiation of apomorphine infusion: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for current clinical practice.

Starting Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on subcutaneous apomorphine (APO) infusion is generally undertaken on a hospital day-case basis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, day-case facilities were unavailable. To avoid delays in treatment, a new procedure was developed for initiation of APO therapy in the patient's home. A home initiation protocol was developed and followed for each patient in this analysis. The hospital team worked in collaboration with APO nurses provided by the manufacturer of APO therapies to implement initiation and undertake follow-up. In this analysis, 27 PD patients were initiated onto APO infusion and 21 (77.8%) achieved a therapeutic response. Home initiation of APO infusion can be undertaken successfully and has benefits for both patients and healthcare teams. This protocol will now continue as a standard of care at our centre.

Real-World Use, Safety, and Patient Experience of 20% Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The CORE study aimed to provide a detailed understanding of real-world immune globulin subcutaneous (human) 20% solution (Ig20Gly) utilization in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) in Germany and Switzerland. METHODS: Patients with PIDs receiving a stable dose of any subcutaneous immunoglobulin for ≥ 3 months before enrollment were eligible for this multicenter (n = 5), phase 4, non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. Besides baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, Ig20Gly utilization and safety data, and patient-reported outcomes (Life Quality Index/Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication) were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients provided data at baseline [69.4% female; mean age: 41.6 years (7-78 years)]. Totals of 23 and 26 patients attended 6- and 12-month visits, respectively; 16 attended all three visits. One patient withdrew consent before 6-month follow-up. Median maximum infusion rates of Ig20Gly at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were 26.7, 24.5, and 40.0 mL/h, respectively (10-60 mL/h). Infusion and dosing parameters remained consistent across time points: patients used a median of two infusion sites, primarily the abdomen, and all patients used an infusion pump; all but one infused at home and most self-administered Ig20Gly (80.8-83.3%) at once-weekly intervals (69.2-73.9%). During follow-up, 10 adverse events were reported: none were rated serious, while 2 were considered probably related to Ig20Gly. Total patient-reported outcome scores remained high throughout the study. CONCLUSION: The CORE study provides real-world evidence of the flexibility, feasibility, safety, and tolerability of Ig20Gly infusions, at mostly weekly intervals, over 1 year in patients with PIDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00014562. Registered April 9, 2018, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00014562.

Primary immunodeficiency diseases are rare diseases that make patients more likely to develop infections than the general population. Many patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases do not produce enough antibodies, which are an important part of the immune system that fight infection. Replacing antibodies is the main way to treat primary immunodeficiency diseases and reduce the risk of infection. Ig20Gly is a type of medication used to replace antibodies and treat primary immunodeficiency diseases. Patients receive Ig20Gly through a needle inserted under the skin and can learn to do this themselves at home. Ig20Gly can be delivered more quickly than other antibody treatments that are less concentrated. CORE was a study of 36 patients (children and adults) taking Ig20Gly for primary immunodeficiency diseases for 1 year in Germany and Switzerland. The aim of the study was to understand how patients use and experience Ig20Gly as part of their normal treatment. In this study, nearly all patients received Ig20Gly treatment at home, and most patients gave Ig20Gly to themselves once a week. A few patients developed serious bacterial infections while being treated with Ig20Gly, and patients were generally satisfied with the treatment. Overall, the CORE study describes how patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases use Ig20Gly in their daily lives, and shows that Ig20Gly treatment can be tailored to suit each patient's needs. Information from this study will help doctors to support patients in making decisions about their treatment.

Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM. METHODS: A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar <7, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal mortality. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. RESULTS: Among 39 eligible studies, 39% of the 5518 pregnancies included were exposed to CSII. Odds of cesarean delivery were higher with CSII (20 studies: 63% vs 56%, odds ratio [OR] 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5]), but we did not identify a difference in the odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (23 studies: 31% vs 34%, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.5]). Among secondary outcomes, only the odds of LGA (20 studies: 47% vs 38%, OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]) were higher in individuals using CSII versus MDI. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CSII (vs MDI) for pregestational DM in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and delivery of an LGA neonate. Further evaluation of how CSII use may influence neonatal size and delivery route is warranted.

International Consensus Recommendation Guidelines for Subcutaneous Infusions of Hydration and Medication in Adults: An e-Delphi Consensus Study.

Infusion of fluids and medications is traditionally performed intravenously. However, venous depletion in patients has led to the quest for vessel health preservation. A safe, effective, acceptable, and efficient alternative is the subcutaneous route. A lack of organizational policies may contribute to the slow uptake of this practice. This modified e-Delphi (electronic) study aimed to derive international consensus on practice recommendations for subcutaneous infusions of fluids and medications. A panel of 11 international clinicians, with expertise in subcutaneous infusion research and/or clinical practice, rated and edited subcutaneous infusion practice recommendations from evidence, clinical practice guidelines, and clinical expertise within an Assessment, Best Practice, and Competency (ABC) domain guideline model. The ABC Model for Subcutaneous Infusion Therapy provides a systematic guideline of 42 practice recommendations for the safe delivery of subcutaneous infusions of fluids and medications in the adult population in all care settings. These consensus recommendations provide a guideline for health care providers, organizations, and policy makers to optimize use of the subcutaneous access route.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20% (Ig20Gly) treatment regimens in pediatric patients with primary immunodeficiencies - real-world data from the IG TATRY study.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulins is associated with fewer systemic adverse events and easier infusion compared to intravenous administration. Ig20Gly is a 20% immunoglobulin formulation effective and safe in patients with primary immune deficiency diseases (PIDDs). Real-world data are scarce, therefore our study aimed to examine the real-life treatment regimen and clinical outcomes of Ig20Gly in Polish children with PIDDs. RESEARCHDESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed the medical documentation of 75 pediatric patients aged 0-17 years (mean 9.9) who received Ig20Gly (Cuvitru®; Baxalta US, Inc.; part of Takeda, MA, U.S.A.). RESULTS: The median exposure to treatment of the study population was 22.3 months. At the end of the study, 59 (78.7%) were still on Ig20Gly. The median monthly dose was 0.40 g/kg. The median treatment interval was 7.7 days. Most patients (96%) used one infusion site. The median infusion rate increased with patient age. The median IgG level in the study population, 8.0 g/L, was stable. There was one case of serious bacterial infection. CONCLUSION: This is the largest, long-term real-world study to date on the treatment patterns of Ig20Gly in pediatric patients with PIDDs. The results of this study support the feasibility and tolerability of Ig20Gly usage in PIDD patients across the pediatric age spectrum. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04636502).

Safety and Efficacy of Hizentra® Following Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Treatment of Primary Immunodeficiencies.

Primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD) comprises a group of disorders of immune function. Some of the most severe PIDD can be treated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Hizentra® is a 20% liquid IgG product approved for subcutaneous administration in adults and children greater than 2 years of age with PIDD-associated antibody deficiency. Limited information is available on the use of Hizentra® in children following HCT for PIDD. A multicenter retrospective chart review demonstrated 37 infants and children (median age 70.1 [range 12.0 to 176.4] months) with PIDD treated by HCT who received Hizentra® infusions over a median duration of 31 (range 4-96) months post-transplant. The most common indication for HCT was IL2RG SCID (n = 16). Thirty-two patients switched from IVIG to SCIG administration, due to one or more of the following reasons: patient/caregiver (n = 17) or physician (n = 12) preference, discontinuation of central venous catheter (n = 16), desire for home infusion (n = 12), improved IgG serum levels following lower levels on IVIG (n = 10), and loss of venous access (n = 8). Serious bacterial infections occurred at a rate of 0.041 per patient-year while on therapy. Weight percentile increased by a mean of 16% during the observation period, with females demonstrating the largest gains. Mild local reactions were observed in 24%; 76% had no local reactions. One serious adverse event (death from sepsis) was reported. Hizentra® was discontinued in 15 (41%) patients, most commonly due to recovery of B cell function (n = 11). These data demonstrate that Hizentra® is a safe and effective option in children who have received HCT for PIDD.

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 16.5% (Cutaquig®) in Primary Immunodeficiency Disease: Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, and Patient Experience with Enhanced Infusion Regimens.

PURPOSE: To achieve reductions in infusion time, infusion sites, and frequency, a prospective, open-label, multicenter, Phase 3 study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) 16.5% (Cutaquig®, Octapharma) at enhanced infusion regimens. METHODS: Three separate cohorts received SCIG 16.5% evaluating volume, rate, and frequency: Cohort 1) volume assessment/site: up to a maximum 100 mL/site; Cohort 2) infusion flow rate/site: up to a maximum of 100 mL/hr/site or the maximum flow rate achievable by the tubing; Cohort 3) infusion frequency: every other week at twice the patient's weekly dose. RESULTS: For Cohort 1 (n = 15), the maximum realized volume per site was 108 mL/site, exceeding the currently labeled (US) maximum (up to 40 mL/site for adults). In Cohort 2 (n = 15), the maximum realized infusion flow rate was 67.5 mL/hr/site which is also higher than the labeled (US) maximum (up to 52 mL/hr/site). In Cohort 3 (n = 34), the mean total trough levels for every other week dosing demonstrated equivalency to weekly dosing (p value = 0.0017). All regimens were well tolerated. There were no serious bacterial infections (SBIs). Most patients had mild (23.4%) or moderate (56.3%) adverse events. The majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens and reported that switching to SCIG 16.5% was easy. CONCLUSIONS: SCIG 16.5% (Cutaquig®), infusions are efficacious, safe, and well tolerated with reduced infusion time, fewer infusion sites, and reduced frequency. Further, the majority of patients found the new infusion regimens to be better or somewhat better than their previous regimens.

Quality of Life Evaluation in Saudi Arabian Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases Receiving 20% Subcutaneous IgG Infusions at Home.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) home infusion is widely used as an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). This study aimed to determine the quality of life (QoL) of patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) after switching to home-based SCIG. METHODS: In this prospective open-label single-center study, QoL was determined using the validated Arabic version of the Child Health Questionnaire at baseline and 3 and 6 months after switching from IVIG to SCIG. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were recruited from July 2018 to August 2021, including 14 females and 10 males. The median age of the patients was 5 years (range, 0-14 years). The patients' diagnoses included severe combined immunodeficiency, combined immunodeficiency, agammaglobulinemia, Omenn syndrome, immunodysregulation, hyper-IgE syndrome, common variable immunodeficiency, and bare lymphocyte syndrome. The median duration on IVIG before inclusion was 40 months (range, 5-125 months). The QoL score showed a significant improvement in the patients' global health at 3 and 6 months compared with those at baseline and a significant improvement in the patients' general health at 3 and 6 months compared with that at baseline. The mean baseline serum IgG trough level was 8.8 ± 2.1 g/L. The mean serum IgG level was significantly higher on SCIG at both 3 and 6 months (11.7 ± 2.3 and 11.7 ± 2.5 g/L, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study involving an Arab population to show improvement in the QoL of patients with PID after switching from hospital-based IVIG to home-based 20% SCIG.

Pediatric Palliative Care at Home: A Prospective Study on Subcutaneous Drug Administration.

CONTEXT: The subcutaneous route is a useful alternative for drug administration in palliative care. Although there is scientific evidence on its use in adult patients, the literature in pediatric palliative care is almost nonexistent. OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience of a pediatric palliative care unit (PPCU) with in-home subcutaneous drug administration symptom control. METHODS: Prospective observational study of patients receiving home-based subcutaneous treatment administered as part of a PPCU treatment regimen over 16 months. Analysis includes demographic and clinical variables and treatment received. RESULTS: Fifty-four different subcutaneous lines were inserted in the 15 patients included, mainly in the thigh (85.2%). The median time of needle in situ was 5.5 days (range: 1-36 days). A single drug was administered in 55.7% of treatments. The most frequently used drugs were morphine chloride (82%) and midazolam (55.7%). Continuous subcutaneous infusion was the predominant administration route (96.7%), with infusion rates oscillating between 0.1 mL/h and 1.5 mL/h. A statistically significant relationship was found between the maximum infusion rate and induration onset. Of the 54 lines placed, 29 (53.7%) had an associated complication requiring line removal. The primary cause for removal was insertion-site induration (46.3%). Subcutaneous lines were mainly used to manage pain, dyspnea, and epileptic seizures. CONCLUSION: In the pediatric palliative care patients studied, the subcutaneous route is most frequently used for administering morphine and midazolam in continuous infusion. The main complication was induration, especially with longer dwell times or higher infusion rates. However, further studies are required to optimize management and prevent complications.